
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 2.4.6
Patched in 2.4.6
Vulnerable: >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.7
Patched in 3.1.7
Vulnerable: >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.4
Patched in 4.1.4
Details
fast-uri serializes the port component of a URI without validating it. When recomposing the authority, fast-uri escapes the userinfo and host components but concatenates the port verbatim, so a port value that is not a sequence of digits can inject authority delimiters. For example, serializing a component whose port is @127.0.0.1:8124 produces http://trusted.example:@127.0.0.1:8124/app, demoting the intended host to userinfo and pointing the authority at an attacker-controlled host. Both fast-uri and Node's URL read the result back as the attacker's host with no error, so re-validating the built URI does not catch it.
This affects applications that build URIs from parts and assign untrusted data to the port component (for example a fixed host from configuration and a port taken from user input or a service record). The same path is reachable through serialize(), normalize(), and equal() in their object forms. A port obtained from parse() is always digits and is not affected.
This vulnerability has been patched in fast-uri 4.1.4, 3.1.7, and 2.4.6. recomposeAuthority now rejects any port that is not *DIGIT per RFC 3986. All users should upgrade.
If upgrading is not immediately possible, validate the port value against the RFC 3986 grammar (digits only) before passing a component to serialize(), normalize(), or equal(), and reject anything else, for example if (!/^\d*$/.test(String(port))) throw new Error('invalid port').
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.24%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 15.1% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/13/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
More npm advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.