
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 4.1.4, <= 4.13.15
Patched in 4.13.16
Details
RegExpRouter, which the default SmartRouter selects for most applications, skipped wildcard middleware in three cases, so a route handler ran without the middleware registered for it:
/api/:tenant{[^/]+}/admin/*, was not applied to a route written as /api/:tenant/admin/:id. (since 4.13.0)/admin/* was not applied to a route registered on /admin* for paths under /admin/. (since 4.1.4)%0A, %0D, %E2%80%A8, %E2%80%A9), no wildcard pattern matched, so the request reached the not-found handler without any wildcard middleware. (since 4.4.0)TrieRouter, LinearRouter and PatternRouter apply the middleware in all three cases.
RegExpRouter decides at registration time which wildcard middleware covers which route. In cases 1 and 2 it treated patterns that match the same requests as different ones. In case 3 the compiled wildcard did not match line terminators.
The fix derives the coverage from the structure of the registered paths and lets wildcards match line terminators. It also corrects other differences from the other routers (a wildcard in the middle of a path with parameters, duplicate middleware, middleware on static routes), and rejects custom patterns that can match the empty string, such as {[0-9]*}, with UnsupportedPathError. PreparedRegExpRouter data must be regenerated.
An unauthenticated client can reach a route handler, or the not-found handler, without the authentication or authorization middleware registered on a wildcard path.
This affects applications that use RegExpRouter, directly or through the default SmartRouter, and rely on wildcard middleware for authentication or authorization.
Use new Hono({ router: new TrieRouter() }).
More npm advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.