Loading
Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
Securing modern cloud infrastructure, identity, and configuration.
Cloud security assessment reviews your AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud environment's identity, configuration, and workload security against the shared-responsibility model, the areas where misconfiguration, not the cloud provider, causes almost all cloud breaches.
Cloud environments introduce a different threat model, identity, configuration, and shared responsibility replace traditional network boundaries. We assess your cloud posture the way an attacker with limited initial access would.
Engagements combine configuration review against best-practice frameworks with hands-on testing of identity, storage, and workload security.
Misconfigured cloud identity and storage are consistently the leading cause of cloud data exposure, and consistently preventable with a proper review. This is inexpensive risk to close relative to the cost of a public data exposure incident.
Right-sizing cloud security also frequently surfaces unused permissions, orphaned resources, and overprovisioned access, tightening security and cloud spend at the same time.
Most cloud breaches start with a setting, not an exploit.
of cloud environments carry at least one critical misconfiguration
Cloud platforms we secure
Not locked into one stack, we work with the platform that already fits your environment.
Amazon Web Services
Google Cloud
Microsoft Azure
Cloudflare6
areas covered
Live from our own KEV archive, plus the industry's own numbers
Cloud-specific CVEs are a smaller slice of the exploited-in-the-wild catalog than network or web, because most real cloud incidents trace back to misconfiguration, not a patchable vulnerability. Both numbers matter.
Cloud exposure tracker
Live + citedCloud-tagged CVEs
0
Breaches involving public cloud (2025)
0%
Avg. public cloud breach cost (2025)
$4.18M
From misconfiguration to fix
An over-permissive IAM role, an exposed storage bucket, an infrastructure-as-code policy gate , and the fix, verified with a clean re-scan.
$ aws iam get-role-policy --role-name lambda-deploy-role
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "*", "Resource": "*" ← wildcard on a CI-triggered role
}
An illustrative walkthrough of how an engagement actually runs, not footage from a real client environment.
Process
Define accounts, subscriptions, and environments in scope.
Enumerate identity, resources, and trust relationships.
Test privilege escalation and lateral movement paths.
Assess misconfigurations against best-practice frameworks.
Deliver findings with cloud-native remediation guidance.
Confirm configuration fixes close identified gaps.
AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, including hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
We typically request read-only or scoped access appropriate to the engagement type, and agree on safe testing boundaries before any active exploitation.
Yes, where IaC (Terraform, CloudFormation, Bicep) is provided, reviewing it pre-deployment catches misconfigurations before they ever reach a live environment, which is cheaper to fix than finding the same issue live.
Yes, we regularly scope engagements spanning AWS, Azure, and GCP together, including how identity and trust relationships are configured across them, which is exactly where multi-cloud environments tend to develop the most overlooked gaps.
Point-in-time, we request scoped, time-boxed access for the engagement itself, not standing access afterward. Access is revoked or rotated once testing and reporting are complete.
Our methodology for cloud security is grounded in established, publicly available frameworks, not a proprietary checklist.
Share a few details about your environment and we'll help you scope the right engagement.