
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 1.14.0, < 1.14.2
Patched in 1.14.2
Details
XdsServer in @grpc/grpc-js-xds does not apply RBACPerRoute overrides from matching Route or VirtualHost resources. When a trusted xDS control plane supplies a broad top-level ALLOW policy and a stricter override, XdsServer ACKs the resources but evaluates the RPC under the top-level policy.
parseOverrideFilterConfig() in packages/grpc-js-xds/src/http-filter.ts:225-257 looks up FILTER_REGISTRY using the override message type:
type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.http.rbac.v3.RBACPerRoute
Source: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/blob/56567d9604b4e45cdca0d2e3c2a60ac227ee659d/packages/grpc-js-xds/src/http-filter.ts#L225-L257
setup() in packages/grpc-js-xds/src/http-filter/rbac-filter.ts:167-173 registers the filter only under the top-level RBAC type:
type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.http.rbac.v3.RBAC
Source: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/blob/56567d9604b4e45cdca0d2e3c2a60ac227ee659d/packages/grpc-js-xds/src/http-filter/rbac-filter.ts#L167-L173
The lookup returns null even though the registered entry contains parseOverrideRbacConfig(), and server.ts silently skips the override.
overrideConfigMaps in server.ts:99-102 is documented as keyed by HTTP filter name, but server.ts:169-174 stores each map under filterConfig.typeUrl.
Route overrides are later looked up by their typed_per_filter_config key, which is the HttpFilter.name. An ordinary key such as rbac therefore misses the stored map.
handleRouteConfigurationResource() in server.ts:225-249 reads route.typed_per_filter_config but never reads virtualHost.typed_per_filter_config.
When no override reaches the RBAC interceptor, rbac-filter.ts:125-155 evaluates the broader top-level policy.
Set:
GRPC_XDS_EXPERIMENTAL_RBAC=true
Run XdsServer with a protected unary handler.
Have the ADS control plane deliver a Listener containing an RBAC HTTP filter named rbac with a top-level ALLOW-any policy:
name: rbac
typed_config:
"@type": type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.http.rbac.v3.RBAC
rules:
action: ALLOW
policies:
allow-any:
principals: [{ any: true }]
permissions: [{ any: true }]
Deliver a matching non-forwarding route with this override:
typed_per_filter_config:
rbac:
"@type": type.googleapis.com/envoy.extensions.filters.http.rbac.v3.RBACPerRoute
rbac:
rules:
action: DENY
policies:
deny-any:
principals: [{ any: true }]
permissions: [{ any: true }]
Invoke the protected unary method without credentials.
Expected: The route-specific DENY policy rejects the RPC before the protected handler runs.
Observed: XdsServer ACKs the resources, retains the top-level ALLOW policy, and runs the protected handler.
Listener and RouteConfiguration: ACKED
gRPC status: OK
handler invocations: 1
response: PROTECTED_SECRET_RECORD_RBAC_OVERRIDE
Users of @grpc/grpc-js-xds who are using RBAC-based authentication with override configurations may unintentionally accept some requests that should be rejected.
More npm advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.