
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 0.2.0, < 0.6.0
Patched in 0.6.0
Details
When the server acts as the fee payer, mpp Elixir 0.4.0 (ZenHive/mpp) does not validate whether the gas_limit set by the client is enough before broadcasting. A malicious client can drain the server's gas without paying.
A transferWithMemo call on Tempo Moderato testnet requires ~51,299 gas to complete successfully. By setting gas_limit = 51,298:
# Run the PoC
unzip mpp_elixir_low_gas_PoC.zip
cd mpp_elixir_low_gas_PoC
docker build -t mpp-elixir-low-gas .
docker run --rm mpp-elixir-low-gas
Zero-Cost DoS Attack: Unlike gas draining with access list or padding, where the malicious client needs to complete a payment to drain the gas, this vulnerability allows malicious users to continuously drain the server's gas at virtually no financial cost (requiring only computing power). Therefore, an attacker can spawn N malicious clients to completely drain the funds from the server's wallet to perform a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Once the server's wallet is empty, it has no more funds to pay the gas fees for upcoming requests from legitimate clients.
# Run the DoS PoC
unzip mpp_elixir_low_gas_dos_PoC.zip
cd mpp_elixir_low_gas_dos_PoC
docker build -t mpp-elixir-dos .
docker run --rm mpp-elixir-dos
Vulnerable code path: broadcast_and_verify/7 in mpp/methods/tempo.ex (ZenHive/mpp 0.4.0).
When wait_for_confirmation = true (the default), it calls rpc_broadcast_sync directly without any gas-adequacy check or simulation. The alternative wait_for_confirmation = false path does call simulate_payment_call via eth_call, but that simulation omits the gas parameter and therefore does not catch out-of-gas conditions.
A malicious client can drain the server's wallet without any financial cost.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.