
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 11.1.0, < 13.0.0
Patched in 13.0.0
Details
Every Pillow wheel from 11.1.0 onward bundles a libopenjp2 containing a heap-buffer-overflow write that is fixed upstream on master but has never appeared in an OpenJPEG release. See https://osv.dev/vulnerability/OSV-2025-219
Because the wheel bundles its own copy, a patched host OS does not help. It is reachable from Image.open(fp); im.load() with default settings.
I am reporting it here rather than only upstream because Pillow is where the vulnerable binary actually reaches users.
Note the inversion that makes this easy to miss: OpenJPEG 2.5.2 and earlier are safe. The bug was introduced in 954c6e3c (2024-06-25), so keeping the dependency current is what creates the exposure.
From .github/dependencies.json (openjpeg) at each tag:
| Pillow | bundled OpenJPEG | status |
|---|---|---|
| 10.4.0 | 2.5.2 | safe |
| 11.0.0 | 2.5.2 | safe |
| 11.1.0, 11.2.1, 11.3.0 | 2.5.3 | affected |
| 12.0.0 … 12.3.0 | 2.5.4 | affected |
Confirmed on an installed wheel: PIL.features.version_codec('jpg_2000') → 2.5.4, bundled file pillow.libs/libopenjp2-*.so.2.5.4. main still pins 2.5.4 as of 2026-10-06.
src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c, in opj_j2k_read_sod:
OPJ_UINT32 l_current_tile_part =
l_cstr_index->tile_index[p_j2k->m_current_tile_number].current_tpsno;
l_cstr_index->tile_index[...].tp_index[l_current_tile_part].end_header = l_current_pos;
l_cstr_index->tile_index[...].tp_index[l_current_tile_part].end_pos =
l_current_pos + p_j2k->m_specific_param.m_decoder.m_sot_length + 2;
tp_index is neither null-checked nor bounds-checked, and l_current_tile_part comes directly from the one-byte TPsot field of the SOT marker.
The correct guard already exists a few lines later in opj_j2k_add_tlmarker (j2k.c:8459), writing the same array at the same index behind if (tp_index && l_current_tile_part < nb_tps). One writer checked, its sibling not.
Reached by giving the codestream a valid TLM marker — so tp_index is allocated once by opj_j2k_build_tp_index_from_tlm, sized to the TLM entry count, and opj_j2k_read_sot then skips all resizing — while setting TNsot = 0 in every SOT, which keeps the TLM "valid" and lets TPsot walk past the allocation.
Fixed upstream in 91d08b11 ("Fix heap buffer overlfow in opj_j2k_read_sod", 2026-02-10).
The newest OpenJPEG tag is v2.5.4 (2025-09-20), and compare/v2.5.4...91d08b11 reports ahead 6, behind 0 — the fix is in no release, 8 months on.
91d08b11 as a patch in the wheel build until an OpenJPEG release includes it — three lines, identical to a guard already present in the same file.Image.open() ignores filename/Content-Type and will reach any compiled-in codec unless formats= is passed would help downstream apps a lot.Image.open() sniffs magic bytes, so a JPEG 2000 codestream in a file named avatar.png declared Content-Type: image/png reaches the JP2 decoder anyway.
I verified this against a production service documenting PNG/JPEG-only uploads: it accepted and fully decoded a JP2 through exactly that path, with 16 formats reachable from one upload endpoint against 43 registered openers. That service has since fixed it by passing formats= and validating on the detected format rather than the client's Content-Type.
That is the reason a decoder-level issue like this one has much wider reach than downstream maintainers tend to assume.
ASan build of OpenJPEG 2.5.4 interposed under a stock Pillow 12.3.0, running Image.open(p); im.load():
==766332==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
WRITE of size 8
#0 opj_j2k_read_sod j2k.c:5086
#1 opj_j2k_read_tile_header j2k.c:9912
#2 opj_read_tile_header openjpeg.c:575
#3 j2k_decode_entry src/libImaging/Jpeg2KDecode.c:793
#4 ImagingJpeg2KDecode src/libImaging/Jpeg2KDecode.c:949
#5 _decode src/decode.c:132
located 8 bytes to the right of a 24-byte region allocated by
opj_j2k_build_tp_index_from_tlm j2k.c:8939
Frames 3–5 are Pillow's own decoder, not a synthetic harness. No non-default decoder options are involved; strict mode is on, which is Pillow's behaviour since Pillow never calls opj_decoder_set_strict_mode. A benign twin image runs the same path cleanly and returns a valid image, so this is the payload and not a parse failure.
I have deliberately not attached the PoC file to this initial report. I'm happy to attach the PoC, the builder script and the RIP-control harness here on request, or hold everything until a fix is ready.
No disclosure deadline from me; I will not publish anything while this is being worked on.
Any application that calls Image.open() / im.load() on an image it did not produce — the overwhelmingly common case for upload handlers, thumbnailers and preview pipelines — can be made to perform an out-of-bounds heap write by supplying one crafted file.
Floor, already certain. On a stock non-sanitised wheel the overflow performs 245 writes walking to +5856 bytes past a 24-byte allocation, and glibc's own heap-metadata checker aborts the process (corrupted size vs. prev_size, corrupted double-linked list, SIGABRT). One file reliably kills a long-lived worker.
Ceiling, demonstrated as a primitive but not as a finished exploit. With same-size-class objects alive on both sides — an ordinary busy heap — the walk crosses opj_event_mgr_t, which holds three opj_msg_callback function pointers, and opj_event_msg then calls one (event.c:136):
rip 0x4000 <- value chosen by the attacker's file layout
rsi 0x3ff2 <- m_error_data, written by the same walk
Shifting the codestream with a COM marker moves rip with it (0x16ce → 0x4000), so the instruction pointer is attacker-chosen rather than incidentally invalid. A benign control image leaves the same groomed heap untouched.
To be explicit about what I did not do: I have not built a working exploit. That additionally needs remote heap grooming and an ASLR defeat, and I attempted neither. I am reporting a controlled control-flow primitive, not a finished chain. The CVSS AC:H reflects that.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.