
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 1.88.6
Patched in 1.88.6
Vulnerable: >= 1.89.0, < 1.89.7
Patched in 1.89.7
Vulnerable: >= 1.90.0, < 1.90.7
Patched in 1.90.7
Vulnerable: >= 1.91.0, < 1.91.5
Patched in 1.91.5
Vulnerable: >= 1.92.0, < 1.92.2
Patched in 1.92.2
Vulnerable: >= 1.93.0, < 1.93.2
Patched in 1.93.2
Vulnerable: >= 1.94.0, < 1.94.3
Patched in 1.94.3
Vulnerable: >= 1.95.0, < 1.95.1
Patched in 1.95.1
Vulnerable: >= 1.96.0, < 1.96.2
Patched in 1.96.2
Details
Any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination they control and cause the proxy to send its own configured provider credentials to that destination. The proxy's request-body validation was a denylist that did not cover every sensitive parameter and did not inspect parameters nested inside other request fields, so a caller could supply a routing or credential value that the proxy applied without clearing the operator's stored key. Any authenticated user could therefore exfiltrate the operator's upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services reachable from the proxy.
Fixed in 1.96.2, 1.95.1, 1.94.3, 1.93.2, 1.92.2, 1.91.5, 1.90.7, 1.89.7, and 1.88.6.
Set general_settings.allow_client_side_credentials to false so callers cannot override connection parameters, restrict proxy keys to trusted callers, and block the affected parameters (api_base, base_url, model_list, fallbacks, provider credential fields) at a reverse proxy or API gateway.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.54%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 46.0% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/15/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
More pip advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.