
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 8.4
Patched in 8.4
Details
RestrictedPython could allow a sandbox escape when a policy exposes the standard library string module, or otherwise exposes string.Formatter, to restricted code.
string.Formatter field resolution methods such as get_field can perform attribute and item traversal internally and return live object references. This can bypass RestrictedPython's normal attribute guards and may allow access to sensitive objects such as function globals, builtins, file access, or code execution primitives.
Users are impacted if they run untrusted code with RestrictedPython and expose string.Formatter, directly or indirectly, for example through a custom import policy or globals.
The problem has been patched by blocking access to string.Formatter and unsafe string.Formatter traversal methods in safer_getattr.
Users should upgrade to the patched release once available. Affected and patched version numbers should be filled in when the release is published.
Do not expose the standard library string module or string.Formatter to restricted code.
If a custom import hook is used, deny imports of string or provide only a restricted wrapper that does not expose Formatter. If custom globals are supplied, ensure neither string.Formatter nor Formatter instances are available to restricted code.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.62%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 49.9% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/1/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.