
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 2.0.14
Patched in 2.0.14
Details
Component: getgrav/grav core
File: system/src/Grav/Common/Security.php
Function: detectXss() (all six entries in the $patterns array use the PCRE u modifier), invoked from Grav\Common\Data\Validation::checkSafety() (the save-time XSS gate for any non-security.xss_whitelist account's blueprint field, including the page content field) and detectXssInEditorContent() (the render-time backstop for GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74)
CWE: CWE-79 (Stored XSS), root-caused by CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation — fails open on malformed input)
Severity: High
CVSS: 8.0 — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
This project's detectXss()/checkSafety() stack has been patched at least three times for the "page editor without super-admin rights stores an event handler that runs for site visitors" bug class: GHSA-9695-8fr9-hw5q / GHSA-c2q3-p4jr-c55f / GHSA-w8cg-7jcj-4vv2 (unquoted-attribute bypasses), GHSA-269c-h76q-8cxw (quoted-attribute-boundary bypass), GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 (render-time Twig-assembled bypass). All three patched the regex logic. This is a different, lower-level defect: the PHP regex engine silently refuses to evaluate the pattern at all once the input contains one invalid UTF-8 byte, independent of what the regex logic says — no amount of regex-logic hardening fixes this.
Every pattern in $patterns uses the PCRE u (UTF-8) modifier. PHP's documented behavior: if the subject string contains even one byte sequence that is not valid UTF-8, preg_match() does not "skip" that byte or report "no match" — it returns false for the entire call, with preg_last_error() === PREG_BAD_UTF8_ERROR. detectXss() only checks truthiness (if (preg_match(...) || preg_match(...))), so false and "0 matches" are indistinguishable to the calling code. A single stray byte anywhere in a field's value — not even near the actual payload — makes every one of the six checks silently report "no XSS found".
Meanwhile, a real browser decoding the same bytes as UTF-8 (the encoding Grav serves pages as) does not fail open: it substitutes the invalid byte with one U+FFFD replacement character and renders the surrounding markup completely normally. The <img ... onerror=...> tag is untouched structurally; the payload still fires.
$patterns = [
'on_events' => '#<(?:"[^"]*"|\'[^\']*\'|[^>"\'])*?(?:[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/]|"[^"]*"|\'[^\']*\')on\s*[a-z]+\s*=#iu',
// ... five more, all with the /u modifier
];
foreach ($patterns as $name => $regex) {
if (!empty($enabled_rules[$name])) {
if (preg_match($regex, (string) $string) || preg_match($regex, $orig)) {
return $name;
}
// ...
}
}
return null; // reached even when the string contains <img onerror=...>,
// as long as it also contains one invalid UTF-8 byte anywhere
Directly reproducible against the exact regex:
$regex = '#<(?:"[^"]*"|\'[^\']*\'|[^>"\'])*?(?:[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/]|"[^"]*"|\'[^\']*\')on\s*[a-z]+\s*=#iu';
var_dump(preg_match($regex, "<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>")); // int(1) -- caught
var_dump(preg_match($regex, "<img src=x \x80onerror=alert(1)>")); // bool(false), preg_last_error()==4
Hello world \x80<img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)> (a raw invalid UTF-8 byte, deliverable via any non-JSON submission path — e.g. the bundled Form plugin's multipart/urlencoded field, or any blueprint-validated field populated from a raw POST body — $_POST values are not UTF-8-validated by PHP).Validation::checkSafety() runs detectXss() on the value; every preg_match() call returns false, so detectXss() returns null ("no violation"). The payload saves unmodified.<img onerror=...> element, executing the attacker's JavaScript in the visitor's session.public static function detectXss($string, ?array $options = null): ?string
{
if (null === $string || !is_string($string) || empty($string)) {
return null;
}
// Fail closed: mb_check_encoding() validates the whole string up front
// and returns a normal boolean — it never "fails open" the way a
// /u-flagged preg_match() does on malformed input.
if (!mb_check_encoding($string, 'UTF-8')) {
return 'invalid_encoding';
}
// ... rest unchanged
}
Validation::checkSafety() only invokes detectXss() for accounts outside security.xss_whitelist (default admin.super), so this introduces no behavior change for whitelisted accounts.
Dynamically confirmed on grav 2.0.13: called the live Security::detectXss() directly (bootstrapped through Grav's own service container, not a standalone regex copy) — a clean payload was correctly flagged ("on_events"), the same payload plus one invalid UTF-8 byte returned NULL (bypass), and an ordinary safe string returned NULL as expected. Note: the JSON REST API (api plugin, the path Admin2's SPA uses to save pages) happens to reject raw invalid UTF-8 before it reaches detectXss(), because RFC 8259 requires JSON text to be valid UTF-8 and PHP's json_decode() enforces this — that's an incidental protection of the JSON layer, not a fix, and any non-JSON submission path (e.g. the bundled Form plugin's multipart/urlencoded fields) remains exposed. After applying the fix above, the same bypass payload correctly returns "invalid_encoding" (a violation), while an ordinary safe string still returns NULL (no regression).
A ready-to-apply fix branch is prepared locally against this repo's develop branch (based on the 2.0.13 tag); happy to push it to a private fork once one is available for this advisory.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.26%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 17.1% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/1/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.