
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: >= 1.0.0-M1, <= 1.0.0-M46
Patched in 1.0.0-M47
Vulnerable: >= 1.0.0-M1, <= 1.0.0-M46
Patched in 1.0.0-M47
Details
Ember's chunk decoder parses the size token leniently: it strips leading and trailing whitespace and accepts a leading + or - sign. RFC9112 §7.1 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG. An intermediary that parses the chunk boundary differently (or rejects it) will disagree with Ember on request framing, enabling HTTP request smuggling (TE.TE).
Request smuggling (TE.TE) when ember-server is an origin behind an intermediary that forwards the body verbatim but interprets the malformed chunk sizes differently
ember-client has the same leniencies on the response path, which enables response smuggling when http4s is used as a gateway. This is less severe, as it requires a malicious or compromised upstream rather than an anonymous remote client.
+ prefix, - prefix, or leading and trailing octets rather than rejecting.EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.37%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 30.7% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/30/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.