
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: <= 0.23.34
Patched in 0.23.35
Vulnerable: >= 1.0.0-M1, <= 1.0.0-M46
Patched in 1.0.0-M47
Vulnerable: >= 1.0.0-M1, <= 1.0.0-M46
Patched in 1.0.0-M47
Details
Ember's HTTP/2 stack replenishes the inbound flow-control window based on bytes received off the wire, not bytes consumed by the application. Received DATA is buffered in an unbounded per-stream channel. Flow control therefore provides no backpressure: a peer can stream a large or unbounded body faster than the application drains it and the connection retains every payload in heap.
This is the read-path mirror of the outbound queue issue.
This affects an Ember receiving a request body and an Ember client receiving a response body from a hostile server.
Unauthenticated remote denial of service (OOM) against any Ember server built
.withHttp2 for a non-draining or slow-draining route, and against an Ember client consuming from a hostile or compromised server.
EntityLimiter middleware) on routes that consume the body.EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.63%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 50.1% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/31/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.