
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 1.6.14
Patched in 1.6.15
Details
The Pusher-compatible REST API includes body_md5 in the HMAC signature string but never computes or verifies the MD5 of the received HTTP body, allowing anyone who observes a signed request to replay it with an entirely different body.
In pusher/http.go, the Handler function extracts body_md5 from the URL query string (line 169) and includes it verbatim in stringToSign (line 175). It then verifies HMAC(stringToSign, secret) == auth_signature. After verification succeeds, handleEvents reads and parses r.Body (lines 201-212) without ever computing md5(body) and comparing it against the body_md5 that was signed. The Pusher protocol specification explicitly requires the server to verify this digest to prevent body-substitution attacks. There is also no auth_timestamp staleness check, so replays are valid indefinitely.
/apps/<app_id>/events?auth_key=K&auth_timestamp=T&auth_version=1.0&body_md5=LEGIT_MD5&auth_signature=SIG carrying body {"name":"safe-event","channel":"ch","data":"..."} (e.g., from TLS-terminating load-balancer logs).{"name":"injected-event","channel":"admin","data":"malicious-payload"}stringToSign matches the original) and broadcasts the injected event to all subscribers of admin.An attacker who can read any single signed Pusher API request (from logs, a shared proxy, or a network tap) can broadcast arbitrary events to any channel indefinitely, potentially forging server-side events, corrupting application state, or delivering phishing messages to WebSocket clients.
After reading r.Body, compute hex(md5(body)) and compare it to the body_md5 query parameter using a constant-time comparison before proceeding. Additionally, reject requests whose auth_timestamp is more than 600 seconds from the current time.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.21%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 11.0% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/2/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.