
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 2.2.0, < 3.0.1
Patched in 3.0.1
Details
When @sylphx/pdf-reader-mcp is run as an HTTP server (MCP_TRANSPORT=http), it reads the MCP_API_KEY environment variable and logs API key authentication enabled (X-API-Key header) at startup, but it never validated the X-API-Key header on incoming requests. The key was read into a variable and never enforced on the request path.
As a result, the /mcp endpoint accepted unauthenticated requests. Combined with the default bind address of 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces), any client able to reach the port could invoke every PDF tool and read the contents of any PDF the server process could open anywhere on the host. URL-based sources also enable limited SSRF (private/loopback addresses are blocked by default unless --allow-private-ips is set).
The misleading startup log made the exposure silent: an operator who set MCP_API_KEY reasonably believed the server was protected when it was not.
This affects only the opt-in HTTP transport; the default stdio transport is unaffected.
Fixed in @sylphx/[email protected]. The fix enforces the X-API-Key header with a constant-time comparison (rejecting missing/mismatched keys with HTTP 401), changes the default bind host to 127.0.0.1 (loopback), and emits a startup warning when binding a non-loopback host without an API key.
For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately:
MCP_HTTP_HOST=127.0.0.1.stdio transport instead of HTTP.--allow-dir / MCP_PDF_ALLOWED_DIRS.Reported privately by novice-22 via responsible disclosure.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.