
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 0.14.0
Patched in 0.14.0
Details
Denial of service via memory exhaustion. Affects all callers who streamed compressed responses relying on the chunk size — explicit (iter_bytes(chunk_size=...)) or the default — to bound memory. The decoder ignored that bound, so a chunk could be far larger than requested and a single compressed response could overflow memory.
import gzip, zapros
# Server returns ~1 GiB of zeros gzip-compressed to ~1 MiB,
# with header: Content-Encoding: gzip
bomb = gzip.compress(b"\0" * 1_000_000_000) # ~1 MiB on the wire
with zapros.stream("GET", "https://malicious.example/bomb") as response:
# Caller asks for 8 KiB chunks, expecting bounded memory:
for chunk in response.iter_bytes(chunk_size=8192):
... # first `chunk` is ~1 GiB, not 8 KiB -> memory exhaustion
Upgrade to 0.14.0 or later. The decoders now bound the output of each decompression step to the requested chunk_size: gzip/deflate via zlib's max_length + unconsumed_tail, brotli via output_buffer_limit, and zstd via a bounded stream_writer. Peak memory during streaming decode is now proportional to chunk_size for all supported encodings.
For unpatched versions:
Response.iter_raw() / Response.async_iter_raw(), which bypass the built-in decoders, and decompress it yourself with an explicit output-size bound (e.g. zlib's max_length), aborting once a configured limit is exceeded.Accept-Encoding: identity to disable response compression so bodies are not decompressed client-side.EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.44%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 38.1% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/8/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.