
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 2.47.10
Patched in 2.47.11
Details
SUNEDITOR v2.47.10 appears to allow JavaScript execution through crafted namespaced HTML elements.
The sanitization logic does not fully remove executable event-handler attributes from certain custom/namespaced tags. As a result, an attacker may be able to inject HTML content that executes JavaScript when the rendered element is interacted with.
This behavior was observed after the changes introduced in this commit:
https://github.com/JiHong88/suneditor/commit/9ed405fb0de676e56cd0e6a13c19c103ad5948d3
Confirmed vulnerable:
2.47.10Potentially affected:
The following payload preserves an executable event handler:
<a:b src="/x"><iframe src=javascript:alert(1)></iframe></a:b>
<p><a:b src="/x" onclick="document.body.style.background='red'">click</a:b></p>
Simplified PoC:
<a:b src="/x" onclick="console.log('XSS:',document.domain,document.cookie)">click</a:b>
<p><a:b src="/x" onmouseover="alert('XSS — '+document.domain)">📎 Click here for solutions</a:b></p>
2.47.10.This may allow an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript into rendered editor content.
Depending on how SUNEDITOR is integrated into an application, this could lead to:
The issue appears to be related to incomplete handling of namespaced/custom HTML elements such as:
<a:b>
Event-handler attributes such as onclick can remain attached to these crafted elements and execute when interacted with.
This suggests that the sanitization process may not consistently normalize and validate custom or namespaced elements before applying attribute filtering.
Possible mitigations include:
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.50%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 43.0% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/9/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.