
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 2.3.24
Patched in 2.3.24
Details
Agno versions prior to 2.3.24 contain an arbitrary code execution vulnerability
in the model execution component. The field_type parameter on a FunctionCall
input field was passed to Python's built-in eval(), allowing an attacker who
could influence that value to execute arbitrary Python code in the Agno process.
This is a code injection flaw (CWE-95) with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVSS 3.1 score: 9.3 (Critical).
Any deployment that exposes Agno to user-influenced FunctionCall inputs (for example via an API, web UI, or untrusted tool/model output) is affected.
Fixed in Agno 2.3.24.
The unsafe eval() call was replaced with a fixed type_mapping dictionary
lookup, and field_type is now validated as either a known string key or an
already-resolved type object before use. See commit
cbf67552
(PR #5912).
All users should upgrade to 2.3.24 or later. The current release line (2.6.x) includes the fix.
There is no safe workaround. Users who cannot upgrade should ensure no
untrusted input can reach the field_type parameter of FunctionCall
input fields, but upgrading is strongly preferred.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.84%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 57.6% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/27/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.