
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 2.10.1
Patched in 2.10.2
Details
sqlite3-ruby cast Ruby string lengths (long) to int before passing them to SQLite. On 64-bit platforms, a string of 4 GiB (2^32 bytes) or larger had its length wrap, so SQLite saw only the first length mod 2^32 bytes. An attacker who controls the length of a SQL string could truncate the query, for example dropping a trailing WHERE clause. The affected paths are:
Database#prepare, #execute, and related methodsStatement#bind_param and related methodsDatabase#create_function, #create_aggregate, and related methods)sqlite3 v2.10.2 raises RangeError when any of these strings is longer than INT_MAX bytes.
The sqlite3-ruby maintainers have evaluated this as medium severity (CVSS 4.8). Exploitation requires an attacker to get at least 4 GiB into a single SQL string or bound value. Most deployments reject a request body that large before the application sees it, and the server must hold several copies of the string in memory.
A truncated bound value is only a prefix of the attacker's input, so the bind paths matter only where the application validated the full value. A truncated SQL string is more serious: when the attacker's input is inlined into the SQL, the clauses that follow it are dropped. If a dropped clause contained a bind placeholder, binding raises SQLite3::RangeException instead of running the query.
Upgrade to sqlite3 v2.10.2 or later.
As a workaround for earlier versions, reject SQL strings and bound values of 4 GiB or larger before passing them to sqlite3-ruby, or limit request body size well below 4 GiB.
This issue was responsibly reported by Luke Jahnke from elttam.
More rubygems advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.