
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 8.1.0.beta1, < 8.1.4.1
Patched in 8.1.4.1
Vulnerable: < 8.0.5.2
Patched in 8.0.5.2
Details
ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper#highlight substitutes each matched phrase into the :highlighter string without escaping it and returns the result marked HTML-safe. Because sanitizing leaves quote characters in text unescaped, a match substituted into a quoted attribute value of the highlighter, such as the <a href="search?q=\1"> form shown in the method's documentation, could end the attribute value and add attributes to the element, possibly leading to XSS. Applications are affected when they pass a :highlighter that places a placeholder inside an attribute value and highlight text or phrases that a user controls. The default <mark>\1</mark> highlighter and the block form are not affected.
The fixed releases HTML-escape each group substituted into the :highlighter string, so quotes in a match are rendered as " and '. Only the numbered placeholders \0 to \9 are expanded; other String#sub replacement escapes, such as \k<name>, \& and \\, are left as written. A match can no longer begin on the > that closes a preceding tag. Escaping makes a placeholder safe as element content or inside a quoted attribute value, but not in an unquoted attribute value, a URL, JavaScript or CSS context, or an attribute whose value is HTML. See the Action View CHANGELOG for details.
Use a :highlighter that places the matched phrase only in element content, such as the default <mark>\1</mark>.
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Patches for those who cannot upgrade at once:
This issue was found by the Anthropic OSS Scanner (ANT-2026-THHUJQVO).
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.34%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 27.6% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/13/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
More rubygems advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.