
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 0.22.0, <= 0.30.0
Patched in 0.31.0
Vulnerable: >= 0.22.0, <= 0.30.0
Patched in 0.31.0
Details
compose-lint fills in ${VAR} references from the .env file next to the Compose file. It is meant to read nothing outside the project directory, and env_file:, include: and extends: paths are checked for that. The .env read is not. If .env is a symlink, compose-lint follows it wherever it points.
A pull request can add a .env symlink to any file on the CI runner and a Compose file that references a variable from it. compose-lint substitutes the value and quotes it in finding messages, which go to the log and to JSON and SARIF output.
The worst target is /proc/self/environ, the linter's own environment. The Compose file only needs to reference the name of the first variable in it: because that file separates variables with NUL bytes rather than newlines, the substituted value is the entire rest of the environment. On a CI runner that environment holds whatever the workflow put there, including secrets. GitHub masks registered secrets in the job log, but not in uploaded JSON or SARIF artifacts or in Code Scanning alert text.
An include: entry's project_directory: has the same gap from 0.28.0: a directory symlink named there makes compose-lint read .env from wherever the link points.
Pull requests from forks normally run without secrets, and GitHub masks registered secrets in the job log, so in the common setup what can be read is runner metadata and whatever unmasked values the job's environment holds. That is why this is scored as low confidentiality impact. The impact is high in a job that runs untrusted pull requests with secrets in its environment, such as a pull_request_target workflow, or on a CI system that does not mask secrets, and also wherever the JSON or SARIF output is uploaded. The pass/fail result is not affected.
Found during an internal pre-1.0 security review.
Fixed in 0.31.0. Every .env read now applies the same containment check as env_file:. A .env that resolves outside the project is treated as missing and reported as an unread input. A project_directory: that resolves outside the project is refused, and that entry's files resolve against their own directories. A .env line containing a NUL byte is skipped.
--no-env, which skips the sibling .env entirely.project/.env -> /proc/self/environ (symlink)
project/compose.yml:
services:
web:
image: "${FIRST_VAR_NAME}"
compose-lint check compose.yml --format json quotes the environment in the CL-0004 message ("Image '...' has no tag").
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.48%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 41.5% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/10/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
More pip advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.