
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 1.7.6
Patched in 1.7.6
Details
joserfc 1.7.4 defines compact-JWS header, payload, and signature limits, but
calls value.split(b".") before validating them. Python bytes.split() copies
the attacker-controlled segments, so the current guard allocates roughly one
complete payload before rejecting it.
.venv-research/bin/python 06-practical-testing/preauth-memory-profile.py
The input is resident before a fork-isolated verifier runs, and every signature is invalid.
| Input | Peak RSS delta | Amplification | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 MiB | 1.11 MiB | 1.11× | size rejected |
| 4 MiB | 4.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 8 MiB | 8.04 MiB | 1.01× | size rejected |
| 16 MiB | 16.04 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
| 32 MiB | 31.74 MiB | 0.99× | size rejected |
| 64 MiB | 63.80 MiB | 1.00× | size rejected |
The unconstrained profile is the primary evidence: joserfc allocates an
additional attacker-sized object before producing its intended
ExceededSizeError. A separate baseline-plus-headroom stress test raises
MemoryError when that copy cannot fit, but this report does not characterize
an absolute RLIMIT_AS value as a realistic worker memory budget.
The issue is not that joserfc can prevent the transport layer from receiving a
large header. The issue is narrower: once bytes reach deserialize_compact(),
the library's existing size guard cannot fulfill its allocation-limiting purpose
because attacker-controlled segment copies are created first.
This differs from GHSA-frfh-8v73-gjg4, which concerned embedding already-loaded oversized segments in exception and log messages. Here, the current implementation itself creates an additional payload-sized allocation before its fixed size exception.
Check len(value) against a maximum compact-serialization size before
split(). If per-segment diagnostics are needed, locate delimiters with bounded
find() operations or memory views, validate offsets and lengths, and only then
materialize acceptable segments.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.19%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 8.9% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/30/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.