
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 1.4.0
Patched in 1.4.1
Details
A connection created with forge.tls.createConnection() throws an uncaught TypeError from process() when it receives a record of another content type while waiting for the rest of a handshake message that was split across records. A peer can trigger this with 18 bytes before the handshake, without authentication, which terminates Node.js processes that use the documented socket wiring. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1.
In lib/tls.js, _readRecord() handles a record that arrives while a handshake message split across records is incomplete. If the record has any other content type (change_cipher_spec, alert, application_data or heartbeat), forge correctly reports "Invalid fragmented record." through c.error() with a fatal unexpected_message alert. That fatal error closes and resets the connection, which sets c.record to null. _readRecord() then continues with c.record.ready = true and throws TypeError: Cannot set properties of null (setting 'ready') out of process(). The code is unchanged since the first release.
RFC 5246 section 6.2.1 allows a handshake message to be fragmented across records, and RFC 8446 section 5.1 forbids interleaving handshake messages with other record types. Failing the connection with unexpected_message is the intended behavior; the bug is the crash after the error.
node-forge reports TLS protocol errors through the error callback, so applications do not normally wrap process() in try/catch. When process() is called from a Node.js socket data handler, as in the documented usage, the exception is uncaught and terminates the process.
The fix returns from _readRecord() right after the fatal error. The connection is failed, the alert is sent and the error callback is called as before, and process() no longer throws.
Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. The connection still fails with a fatal unexpected_message alert and the error callback, but process() no longer throws.
Wrap every call to connection.process() in try/catch. The connection has already been failed and closed when the exception is thrown, so the exception can be ignored or the socket destroyed.
Input (server mode), two records, 18 bytes:
16 03 01 00 06 01 00 00 10 03 01 handshake record: ClientHello header announcing 16 bytes, 2 present 15 03 01 00 02 02 28 alert record
// c = forge.tls.createConnection({server: true, ...}) c.process(forge.util.hexToBytes('1603010006010000100301' + '15030100020228'));
On 1.4.0 the error callback receives "Invalid fragmented record.", then process() throws TypeError: Cannot set properties of null (setting 'ready'). A change_cipher_spec, application_data or heartbeat record in place of the alert has the same effect, and a client connection behaves the same with a fragment of a ServerHello. In a Node.js server that calls c.process(data.toString('binary')) from socket.on('data', ...), a client sending these 18 bytes terminates the server process. On 1.4.1 the connection fails with a fatal unexpected_message alert and process() returns normally.
Regression tests in tests/unit/tls.js, "fragmented handshake messages": each of the four other record types after a handshake fragment, in server and client mode, plus same-type continuation records that are still accepted.
Applications that use node-forge's TLS implementation: connections from forge.tls.createConnection(), including those created by forge.tls.wrapSocket() and the forge.http / forge.xhr TLS connections. Any peer that can connect to a forge TLS server, or any server a forge TLS client connects to, can send 18 bytes before the handshake, without authentication. In Node.js applications using the documented usage, the uncaught exception terminates the process, which drops every connection it serves, and the attacker can repeat it on every restart. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.41%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 35.4% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/31/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.