
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: <= 1.4.0
Patched in 1.4.1
Details
The AES-GCM mode in forge.cipher does not validate the tagLength option passed to start(). With a tagLength of 0 or a value that converts to 0 (such as null, false, '' or '0'), the authentication tag is empty, and decipher.finish() returns true for any ciphertext and additional data when the supplied tag is empty or missing. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1.
modes.gcm.prototype.start() in lib/cipherModes.js stored the tagLength option without validation, and lib/cipher.js documented it as accepting "0-128". After processing the data, afterFinish() truncates the 16-byte tag with truncate(16 % (tagLength / 8)). For a tagLength that converts to 0, this is 16 % 0 = NaN, and truncating by NaN empties the tag. On decryption, the start-time check that the supplied tag has tagLength / 8 bytes passes for an empty tag, and the final tag comparison compares two empty strings, so decipher.finish() returns true for any ciphertext and additional data.
NIST SP 800-38D section 5.2.1.2 allows only tag lengths of 128, 120, 112, 104 and 96 bits, plus 64 and 32 bits for certain applications.
The fix validates tagLength in start(), for both encryption and decryption. A missing, null or undefined tagLength uses the default of 128 bits. Any other value is converted with Number() and must be one of 128, 120, 112, 104, 96, 64 or 32; otherwise start() throws "Invalid tag length.". Numeric strings such as '128' are still accepted. With a validated tagLength, an empty tag no longer matches the expected tag length and is rejected.
Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. cipher.start() now throws an error unless tagLength is one of the tag lengths allowed by NIST SP 800-38D (128, 120, 112, 104, 96, 64 or 32 bits); a null or undefined tagLength means the default of 128 bits.
Do not derive tagLength from received data. Pass a fixed tagLength (or omit it to use the default of 128 bits), and check that the received tag has the expected length before calling start(), for example if(tag.length !== 16) { throw new Error('Invalid tag.'); } before decipher.start({iv: iv, tag: tag});.
Start an AES-GCM decipher with tagLength: 0 and an empty tag, as an application does when it derives the tag length from a received empty tag, and feed it arbitrary bytes that were never encrypted under the key:
var decipher = forge.cipher.createDecipher('AES-GCM', key);
decipher.start({iv: iv, tag: '', tagLength: 0});
decipher.update(forge.util.createBuffer('any attacker-chosen bytes'));
decipher.finish();
// <= 1.4.0: true
// 1.4.1: start() throws "Invalid tag length."
tagLength values null, false and '0' (with an empty tag), and tagLength: 0 with no tag option, give the same result on <= 1.4.0. The fix adds regression tests in tests/unit/aes.js.
Applications that decrypt AES-GCM data with forge.cipher.createDecipher() ('AES-GCM') and pass a zero-like tagLength are affected. Typical cases are a tag length derived from the received tag, or an unset configuration value:
var decipher = forge.cipher.createDecipher('AES-GCM', key);
decipher.start({iv: iv, tag: receivedTag, tagLength: receivedTag.length * 8});
decipher.update(forge.util.createBuffer(receivedCiphertext));
if(decipher.finish()) { /* attacker-supplied data accepted */ }
An attacker who can send a ciphertext with an empty tag to such an application can make it accept attacker-chosen ciphertext as authentic. Because GCM encryption is a stream cipher, an attacker who knows (part of) a captured message's plaintext can also change that plaintext to chosen values. The default (no tagLength option, 128 bits) and any fixed valid tagLength are not affected.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.21%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 10.7% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/31/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.