
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 9.0.0, <= 14.0.1
Patched in 14.0.2
Details
In glob 13.0.6, an aborted async walk rejects or emits an error but continues recursively reading directories in the background.
The root cause is that abort branches in src/walker.ts call cb() without returning. As a result, callers that rely on signal or AbortSignal.timeout() to bound glob traversal cost can still incur filesystem I/O and CPU work after the request has already been rejected.
This was reproduced on glob v13.0.6 (commit e80cb38ae60d6cbff9e75f39032a994858994d35).
The README documents that the signal option cancels the glob walk. However, in src/walker.ts, the following methods call cb() when this.signal?.aborted is true but do not return:
Example vulnerable pattern:
if (this.signal?.aborted) cb()
Because execution continues after cb(), the walker still reaches processor.processPatterns(), readdirCB(), and recursive walkCB2() calls.
The issue was directly demonstrated against v13.0.6. A source-history review shows the same missing-return pattern is present in tagged releases from v9.0.0 through v13.0.6.
The issue affects both glob() and globStream().
Recommended fix: Change each abort branch to return immediately:
if (this.signal?.aborted) return cb()
Environment:
Reproduction steps:
Install the affected package: npm init -y npm install [email protected]
Run the attached PoC: node poc/abort-continues-work.mjs
The PoC aborts after the first readdir() call, waits briefly, and counts how many more directory reads happen after the promise has already rejected.
Observed output on the vulnerable version:
{ "rejection": "Error: probe-abort", "readdirCalls": 1365, "readdirCallsAtReject": 5, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 1360 }
Expected behavior: readdirCallsAfterReject should be 0.
A second PoC using AbortSignal.timeout() also reproduces the issue:
{ "rejection": "TimeoutError: The operation was aborted due to timeout", "readdirCalls": 133, "readdirCallsAtReject": 1, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 132 }
The same test against a patched build with return cb() in the four abort branches stops immediately:
{ "readdirCalls": 1, "readdirCallsAtReject": 1, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 0 }
This is an availability issue.
Applications that expose globbing over attacker-influenced patterns or attacker-controlled directory trees and use AbortSignal / AbortSignal.timeout() as a traversal budget can still perform significant filesystem I/O and CPU work after a request has already timed out or been canceled.
Repeated timed-out requests can stack background glob walks and degrade worker throughput or service availability.
No confidentiality or integrity impact was observed.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.35%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 28.7% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/31/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.