
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 0.16.0, < 0.32.0
Patched in 0.32.0
Details
vLLM's /v1/responses endpoint accepts request-level chat_template_kwargs, but does not apply the --trust-request-chat-template gate that protects Chat Completions, render, tokenize, and pooling paths.
When the server is run with the documented default trust_request_chat_template=False and no explicit --chat-template, a Responses request can pass:
{"chat_template_kwargs": {"chat_template": "<attacker Jinja template>"}}
That key is preserved by ChatParams.get_apply_chat_template_kwargs() and then bound as the chat_template parameter to the shared HF renderer. Prior vLLM advisories establish that request-controlled Jinja chat templates can cause CPU/memory exhaustion. This report covers the current-head Responses sibling path missed by the earlier fixes.
The shared OpenAI frontend has a validation helper that rejects request-supplied chat templates unless the trust flag is enabled. It explicitly checks both top-level chat_template and chat_template_kwargs["chat_template"].
Responses is a separate serving path:
vllm/entrypoints/openai/responses/protocol.py exposes chat_template_kwargs.ResponsesRequest.build_chat_params() merges request kwargs.OpenAIServingResponses._effective_chat_template_kwargs() uses those kwargs.ChatParams.get_apply_chat_template_kwargs() preserves a request chat_template key when the server chat template is None.vllm/renderers/hf.py unpacks the result into safe_apply_chat_template.There is no equivalent trust gate in vllm/entrypoints/openai/responses/serving.py.
An authenticated caller who can submit /v1/responses requests can supply a request-controlled Jinja chat template despite the trust flag being disabled. The expected fixed behavior is the same as Chat Completions: reject chat_template_kwargs["chat_template"] unless the server was started with --trust-request-chat-template.
trust_request_chat_template to OpenAIServingResponses.args.trust_request_chat_template when constructing the Responses serving object.request.chat_template_kwargs["chat_template"] before rendering when trust is false.enable_thinking working./v1/responses.Source sweep found the affected shape in:
v0.16.0v0.18.0v0.20.0v0.21.0v0.22.0v0.22.1v0.23.0470229c37efaf69c86e8bc97482b0b1ff7551c65origin/main b3f0a0a0df76dda92ec4b2c9335f77e84adad911Suggested affected range:
>= 0.16.0, <= 0.23.0
This is related to, but distinct from:
GHSA-6fvq-23cw-5628 / CVE-2025-61620GHSA-69j4-grxj-j64p / CVE-2025-62426Those advisories establish the security impact of request-controlled Jinja templates and chat_template_kwargs, but they cover older Chat Completions/tokenize implementations. This report covers a current /v1/responses sibling path that still lacks the trust gate.
Local prior submissions this report..029 do not cover this root cause.
This advisory was fixed in MR50300.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.32%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 25.4% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/28/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.