
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 3.7.1
Patched in 3.7.1
Details
Package: @apostrophecms/import-export, version 3.7.0.
Release tag reviewed: @apostrophecms/[email protected], commit 9500b8b0e1d630d5e07fbb5fd2c25ed0943845ce (September 30, 2026).
Current main reviewed: 5ce3732be0ebdebb4db0f8ef160c81e8671157e6.
The importer, gzip extractor, import permission gate, and core permission implementation have no differences between that release tag and the reviewed main. This follow-up is a static remediation review. We have not repeated the original end-to-end reproductions against the latest release or tested a deployed site. Current exploitability and impact therefore still require maintainer validation; the observations below establish that the reported security checks remain absent in public source. The original emailed PDF contains the original reproduction material. Please refer to that existing private attachment.
The current gzip extractor handles destination write errors and waits for write completion; those parts of the original report should no longer be treated as unchanged. The import routes also now require a logged-in user before big-upload processing, as covered by GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq.
However, extract() still writes expanded archive entries without per-entry, aggregate decompressed-byte, or entry-count quotas. Archive parsing still precedes document-type authorization. If extraction or parsing fails, import() notifies and rethrows before the later storage.remove() call, with no unconditional cleanup around that lifecycle. The reported residual risk is excessive storage consumption and retained extraction/staging artifacts from authenticated imports. Handling a write error and requiring login do not enforce a storage budget.
Suggested remediation: add configurable streaming quotas based on actual decompressed bytes, cap entries and allowed entry types, bound concurrent imports, and clean local and uploadfs artifacts on every failure. Retain continuation artifacts only under explicit ownership, expiry and total-storage limits.
Source references:
Vivek R / Winfunc Original reporting team: Mufeed VH / Winfunc
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.45%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 37.6% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/21/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.