
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 5.12.2, < 5.12.6
Patched in 5.12.6
Details
Fastify lowercases header names in a headers schema before compilation, because Node.js stores request header names in lowercase. This normalization does not reach the header names held in a propertyNames subschema's enum and const. A header-name deny-list written in the canonical header case, such as propertyNames: { not: { enum: ['X-Debug-Override'] } }, therefore never matches the lowercased request headers, and the forbidden header reaches the handler. Any application that uses a propertyNames deny-list or allow-list to constrain request header names does not get the constraint it expects. The same rule written in lowercase works, and the not: { required: [...] } form is unaffected, so this is a gap in the built-in normalization rather than a wrong schema. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-84428 (GHSA-9q9j-q6p8-xq58), whose normalization covered header names used as property keys but not those used as values inside propertyNames.
Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.6 or later, which lowercases header names held in enum and const inside a propertyNames subschema so they match the lowercased request headers. Header-name constraints that cannot be normalized automatically, regular expressions (propertyNames pattern and patternProperties keys) and a $ref used inside propertyNames, are documented and, for the $ref case, warned at startup (FSTSEC003). Author those to match the lowercased request headers.
Write the propertyNames header-name constraint in lowercase (for example enum: ['x-debug-override']), or enforce the header check in an onRequest or preValidation hook instead of the schema.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.26%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 16.4% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 10/22/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.