
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.
A GitHub-reviewed security advisory, not necessarily under active exploitation the way our CISA KEV advisories are, but a real, disclosed vulnerability in an open-source dependency.
Affected packages
Vulnerable: >= 4.0.0, < 5.0.12
Patched in 5.0.12
Vulnerable: >= 3.0.0, < 3.0.9
Patched in 3.0.9
Vulnerable: >= 2.0.0, < 2.1.7
Patched in 2.1.7
Vulnerable: < 1.1.21
Patched in 1.1.21
Details
Expanding {a},b}-shaped input takes time quadratic in the number of literal } characters, blocking the event loop.
Bash preserves a quirk where a brace group followed by a comma set still expands ({a},b}). The parser implements this by rewriting the string and restarting the scan. Each pass absorbs exactly one } and re-scans from the beginning, so n trailing braces cost n full passes.
const build = n => '{a}' + '}'.repeat(n) + ',z}'
for (const n of [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) {
const t = Date.now()
expand(build(n))
console.log(n, Date.now() - t + 'ms')
}
| n | input | time | results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8,000 | 8 KB | 110 ms | 2 |
| 16,000 | 16 KB | 446 ms | 2 |
| 32,000 | 32 KB | 1.7 s | 2 |
| 64,000 | 64 KB | 6.9 s | 2 |
| 128,000 | 128 KB | 27.7 s | 2 |
ms/n^2 is flat at ~1.7 and each doubling of n costs exactly 4.0x - quadratic. 128 KB of input blocks the event loop for nearly half a minute to produce two results.
Instrumenting the rewrite branch confirms it runs exactly n + 1 times, once per literal }, each re-scanning the whole string.
There is a second multiplier. The rewrite replaces the group's closing } with the internal escClose sentinel, which is '\0CLOSE' + Math.random() + '\0' - about 25 characters. The working string therefore grows by ~25 characters on every pass:
| n | input length | final string length |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 1,006 | 26,006 |
| 8,000 | 8,006 | 208,006 |
So the input is inflated roughly 26x, and that factor multiplies both the quadratic constant and peak memory. This makes it partly a memory-pressure issue as well as a CPU one.
max and maxLength do not helpThe cost is in parsing, before the result set exists. The payload yields 2 results regardless of size, so neither bound is ever reached.
An application passing an untrusted pattern to expand(), directly or through minimatch / glob, can have its event loop blocked for tens of seconds by a payload well under minimatch's 65,536-character cap. For a single-threaded Node server that is a full stall, not just a slow request.
Degraded availability rather than a crash - the process recovers once the expansion completes.
Verified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, all within a few percent of each other (~460-490 ms at n=16,000).
The rewrite loop gets an iteration bound. Past the cap the remaining string is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, consistent with the existing max / maxLength caps, which truncate rather than throw.
Note this bounds the number of passes, not the cost of each: worst-case work remains proportional to cap x input length. The cap is set low enough that the residual is bounded in practice, and far above what any realistic {a},b} input needs.
Scored 5.3 Medium (A:L) for consistency with GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp, the other algorithmic-complexity advisory on this package (CWE-407), which uses the same vector. The stack-exhaustion advisories on this package score A:H because they crash the process outright; this one stalls it.
EPSS, exploit probability
Low0.43%
estimated chance of real-world exploitation in the next 30 days, higher than 37.6% of every CVE FIRST.org scores
Refreshed 11/14/2026, via FIRST.org's EPSS model, not CVSS, this measures likelihood of exploitation, not how severe it would be.
More npm advisories
Talk to us about this
Find out whether this dependency (or others like it) is actually reachable in your codebase.
Get help patching, or building dependency-scanning into your pipeline going forward.
A secure code review or supply chain review finds this before an advisory does.