
Loading

Loading
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this site, and analytics cookies to understand how it's used. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Scientists and entrepreneurs knew the dangers of AI a quarter-century ago.
Summary
But animated by curiosity and profit, they went ahead anyway Over the past few weeks, many of us have struggled to concoct a mental image of brains in the cloud jumping their “sandbox”, sneaking onto the internet, recruiting “swarms” of other “agents” to cheat on a test, and, after discussing the ethics of the act, hacking into a wiki platform with the weird name Hugging Face. We knew that artificial intelligence was devouring our jobs, degrading our kids’ education, and deepfaking our politics; that datacenters were sucking up our water and electricity and sending us the bills. But until 8 September, when the Anthropic computer scientist Jacob Coxon posted his existential terror on Twitter/X, few of us suspected AI might be endangering our survival.
Continue reading...
KazaSec's take
Most public cloud incidents trace back to a misconfiguration — an overly permissive IAM role, a storage bucket left open, a default setting nobody revisited — rather than a flaw in the cloud provider itself. A cloud security review is built to catch exactly that class of mistake before it's found the hard way.
Coverage details
We've archived 175 other articles touching the same topic (computing, ai (artificial intelligence), us news) — see the full security news archive.
Relevant from KazaSec
More coverage on this topic
We help organizations find and fix the gaps before they make headlines.